Username: sleighwhite
Select the type of case you wish to file with the court: CRIMINAL APPEAL
Defendant: Jack Wiggam (jamp0t.)
Pineapple Jarr (jamesswaa)
I. Statement of Claim 1. Based on the Arrest Warrants listed below, there is a claim via affidavit that the identities of both of the defendants were discovered on the scene of the alleged crime. The only information that the warrants outline as to what in their description or interaction might identify the suspects as the defendants is a nickname being used by one of the suspects.
2. When asked for an incident report outlining the full details of the incident, we received a blank incident report and were denied access to any additional evidence with the exception of what is on the arrest warrants.
3. The defense claims that because any evidence regarding the specific sequence of events did not exist prior to the signature and execution of two arrest warrants, nor did it exist 6 days later wherein an attorney requested the Incident Report mentioned in the warrants, that there is not sufficient evidence in order to convict.
4. The Defense claims that any physical evidence that was in fact collected at the time of the incident in question lacks foundation as there is no testimony to support it.
5. The Defense would object to any such written report or evidence being added at this point so far after the fact as it could misstate facts or be hearsay.
Additionally - should somehow, an incident report be brought forth that was not written after the fact, meaning after it was requested and found to be incomplete, the Defense will continue this appeal with a motion to dismiss on the grounds of suppression of or withholding evidence as the Defendants were both well within their rights to have access to the Incident Report in question at the time their attorney requested it.
II. Charge(s) Jack Wiggam:
P.C. 213 Kidnapping x1
P.C. 310 Armed Robbery of a Jewelry Store x1
P.C. Possession of Class 2 Weapon x1
P.C. 810 Felony Evading a Peace Officer x1
Pineapple Jarr:
P.C. 213 Kidnapping x1
P.C. 310 Armed Robbery of a Jewelry Store x1
P.C. Possession of Class 2 Weapon x1
P.C. 810 Felony Evading a Peace Officer x1
III. Representative Devyn Little (sleighwhite)
Nia Liviaus (selliee)
IV. Officers Involved H. Aziz (22gz)
C. Roscoe (masik52)
A. Petroski (kdkdi)
V. Evidence Incident Report
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1136060702675697725/1136061701490479155/wBzgmIN.png
Jack Wiggam Arrest Warrant
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ev4w_hZg8VQl6i1-_m3bHy6YJuXtVUpvbjfVi7p52jM/edit?usp=sharing
Pineapple Jarr Arrest Warrant
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19czPX0-bmxl2b-2HtgohB4gb-J0FPRmtPrhsaGjx-xg/edit?usp=sharing
VI. Actions Taken Jack Wiggam
Pineapple Jarr
VII. Witnesses None at this time
Select the type of case you wish to file with the court: CRIMINAL APPEAL
Defendant: Jack Wiggam (jamp0t.)
Pineapple Jarr (jamesswaa)
I. Statement of Claim 1. Based on the Arrest Warrants listed below, there is a claim via affidavit that the identities of both of the defendants were discovered on the scene of the alleged crime. The only information that the warrants outline as to what in their description or interaction might identify the suspects as the defendants is a nickname being used by one of the suspects.
2. When asked for an incident report outlining the full details of the incident, we received a blank incident report and were denied access to any additional evidence with the exception of what is on the arrest warrants.
3. The defense claims that because any evidence regarding the specific sequence of events did not exist prior to the signature and execution of two arrest warrants, nor did it exist 6 days later wherein an attorney requested the Incident Report mentioned in the warrants, that there is not sufficient evidence in order to convict.
4. The Defense claims that any physical evidence that was in fact collected at the time of the incident in question lacks foundation as there is no testimony to support it.
5. The Defense would object to any such written report or evidence being added at this point so far after the fact as it could misstate facts or be hearsay.
Additionally - should somehow, an incident report be brought forth that was not written after the fact, meaning after it was requested and found to be incomplete, the Defense will continue this appeal with a motion to dismiss on the grounds of suppression of or withholding evidence as the Defendants were both well within their rights to have access to the Incident Report in question at the time their attorney requested it.
II. Charge(s) Jack Wiggam:
P.C. 213 Kidnapping x1
P.C. 310 Armed Robbery of a Jewelry Store x1
P.C. Possession of Class 2 Weapon x1
P.C. 810 Felony Evading a Peace Officer x1
Pineapple Jarr:
P.C. 213 Kidnapping x1
P.C. 310 Armed Robbery of a Jewelry Store x1
P.C. Possession of Class 2 Weapon x1
P.C. 810 Felony Evading a Peace Officer x1
III. Representative Devyn Little (sleighwhite)
Nia Liviaus (selliee)
IV. Officers Involved H. Aziz (22gz)
C. Roscoe (masik52)
A. Petroski (kdkdi)
V. Evidence Incident Report
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1136060702675697725/1136061701490479155/wBzgmIN.png
Jack Wiggam Arrest Warrant
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ev4w_hZg8VQl6i1-_m3bHy6YJuXtVUpvbjfVi7p52jM/edit?usp=sharing
Pineapple Jarr Arrest Warrant
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19czPX0-bmxl2b-2HtgohB4gb-J0FPRmtPrhsaGjx-xg/edit?usp=sharing
VI. Actions Taken Jack Wiggam
| Total jail time: | 260m | Total fine amount: | $5,300 |
Pineapple Jarr
| Total jail time: | 260m | Total fine amount: | $5300 |
VII. Witnesses None at this time
