Username: PlatypusOnTop
Select the type of case you wish to file with the court:
CRIMINAL APPEAL
Defendant:
Bill Brook (Vol5)
I. Statement of Claim
1. The defense claims that the accused Bill Brook did in fact break no laws.
2. The defense will show that the accused received a warning about this charge and was then issued a warrant on the same charge a day later.
3. The governor was on scene and had to take the situation up to the heads of the San Andres Aviation Administration. She felt that the law as it currently is, needed to be clarified on even further and that the situation needed to be voted on by the heads of the SAAA. The helicopter used in the alleged crime was never towed away by the police or state. It was deemed safe enough to be able to take off from its position. As the law is currently stated in the SOP, my client followed every part of the guidelines and broke no laws.
4. The defense claims that the two officers involved in this situation acted to try and interpret the law instead of enforcing what is actually the written law. There is no evidence that shows my client breaking the law except for the word of the two officers involved. The governor, who witnessed the situation could not say that the law was broken
per the current SOP guidelines. Even though the situation is being voted on by the heads of the SAAA, the police decided to interpret the law themselves and charge my client on a matter that requires more clarification. A CFI instructor came in during the questioning of my client and detailed that my client had broken no laws. There are multiple instances that show my client broke no current laws and that the police have charged my client with their interpretation of the law and not what the law actually is.
5. The defense would like to file a motion to dismiss based on the above claims
II. Charge(s)
1x P.C. 815 Reckless Operations of an Aircraft
III. Representative
Andres Lobo Brook Phoenix Gunn (PlatypusOnTop)
IV. Officers Involved
J. Sausage
J.Goff (brundoggy)
V. Evidence
No evidence presented yet
VI. Actions Taken
25 months, $2,500 fine
VII. Witnesses
Emma Johnson (ioverthink)
Moouwu (mooouwu)
Ruby June Lawson (Kay.32)
Select the type of case you wish to file with the court:
CRIMINAL APPEAL
Defendant:
Bill Brook (Vol5)
I. Statement of Claim
1. The defense claims that the accused Bill Brook did in fact break no laws.
2. The defense will show that the accused received a warning about this charge and was then issued a warrant on the same charge a day later.
3. The governor was on scene and had to take the situation up to the heads of the San Andres Aviation Administration. She felt that the law as it currently is, needed to be clarified on even further and that the situation needed to be voted on by the heads of the SAAA. The helicopter used in the alleged crime was never towed away by the police or state. It was deemed safe enough to be able to take off from its position. As the law is currently stated in the SOP, my client followed every part of the guidelines and broke no laws.
4. The defense claims that the two officers involved in this situation acted to try and interpret the law instead of enforcing what is actually the written law. There is no evidence that shows my client breaking the law except for the word of the two officers involved. The governor, who witnessed the situation could not say that the law was broken
per the current SOP guidelines. Even though the situation is being voted on by the heads of the SAAA, the police decided to interpret the law themselves and charge my client on a matter that requires more clarification. A CFI instructor came in during the questioning of my client and detailed that my client had broken no laws. There are multiple instances that show my client broke no current laws and that the police have charged my client with their interpretation of the law and not what the law actually is.
5. The defense would like to file a motion to dismiss based on the above claims
II. Charge(s)
1x P.C. 815 Reckless Operations of an Aircraft
III. Representative
Andres Lobo Brook Phoenix Gunn (PlatypusOnTop)
IV. Officers Involved
J. Sausage
J.Goff (brundoggy)
V. Evidence
No evidence presented yet
VI. Actions Taken
25 months, $2,500 fine
VII. Witnesses
Emma Johnson (ioverthink)
Moouwu (mooouwu)
Ruby June Lawson (Kay.32)