Username: NiaLiviaus
Select the type of case you wish to file with the court:
CRIMINAL APPEAL
Defendant:
Larissa Johnson-Brooks
I. Statement of Claim
Ms. Johnson-Brooks was arrested in relation to the discovery of certain items within a property she previously rented. We believe that there are significant grounds for appeal based on the circumstances surrounding the findings and the subsequent legal proceedings.
Background: Larissa Johnson-Brooks was a tenant of a property located at Hillcrest Avenue 18. It is crucial to note that Ms. Brooks had engaged the services of an interior designer to decorate the house but had not moved any personal belongings into the property. Upon deciding to find another residence, Ms. Brooks relinquished her tenancy of the aforementioned property.
The Arrest: Ms. Johnson-Brooks was arrested based on the discovery of items within the property after she had vacated it. The defense contends that these items were not hers and that, as she was no longer a tenant at the time of the findings, she cannot be held responsible for the possessions discovered within the property.
Ownership Dispute: It has come to our attention that an individual named Deedy Sanchez claims ownership of all the items found within the property. Mr. Sanchez asserts that the belongings in question were his, and he has confirmed that he had access to the property during Ms. Johnson-Brooks' tenancy. This raises serious doubts about the connection between Ms. Johnson-Brooks and the discovered items.
Access by Various Individuals: Furthermore, it is pertinent to mention that numerous individuals had access to the property after Ms. Johnson-Brooks moved out. The defense argues that the discovered items could have been introduced by any person with access to the property during this period, thereby casting doubt on Ms. Johnson-Brooks' culpability.
In light of the above, we contend that the evidence against Ms. Johnson-Brooks is circumstantial, and her arrest and subsequent charges are unjust.
II. Charge(s)
III. Representative
Nia Liviaus
IV. Officers Involved
N/A [none were listed in the incident report]
V. Evidence
Arrest Warrant: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SESK29eI1rg7m1_RtVT32ytGqpD7lcRXZMFSp50SKSo/edit
incident report:
VI. Actions Taken
VII. Witnesses
Character Witnesses:
T-640 Owen Clarke
CO-360 Albus Davies
T-646 Mike Sleezy
CO-305 Bronson Stone
S-220 Mike West
T-601 John Shepard
T-690 Bruno Wilson
ST-401 Bo Stabler
Deedy Sanchez
The defense will be submitting a written statement from Quinton Johnson during discovery.
Select the type of case you wish to file with the court:
CRIMINAL APPEAL
Defendant:
Larissa Johnson-Brooks
I. Statement of Claim
Ms. Johnson-Brooks was arrested in relation to the discovery of certain items within a property she previously rented. We believe that there are significant grounds for appeal based on the circumstances surrounding the findings and the subsequent legal proceedings.
Background: Larissa Johnson-Brooks was a tenant of a property located at Hillcrest Avenue 18. It is crucial to note that Ms. Brooks had engaged the services of an interior designer to decorate the house but had not moved any personal belongings into the property. Upon deciding to find another residence, Ms. Brooks relinquished her tenancy of the aforementioned property.
The Arrest: Ms. Johnson-Brooks was arrested based on the discovery of items within the property after she had vacated it. The defense contends that these items were not hers and that, as she was no longer a tenant at the time of the findings, she cannot be held responsible for the possessions discovered within the property.
Ownership Dispute: It has come to our attention that an individual named Deedy Sanchez claims ownership of all the items found within the property. Mr. Sanchez asserts that the belongings in question were his, and he has confirmed that he had access to the property during Ms. Johnson-Brooks' tenancy. This raises serious doubts about the connection between Ms. Johnson-Brooks and the discovered items.
Access by Various Individuals: Furthermore, it is pertinent to mention that numerous individuals had access to the property after Ms. Johnson-Brooks moved out. The defense argues that the discovered items could have been introduced by any person with access to the property during this period, thereby casting doubt on Ms. Johnson-Brooks' culpability.
In light of the above, we contend that the evidence against Ms. Johnson-Brooks is circumstantial, and her arrest and subsequent charges are unjust.
II. Charge(s)
| Trafficking of a Class 2 Weapon | x1 |
| Possession of a Class 2 Weapon | x4 |
| Possession of an Unregistered Firearm | x1 |
| Trafficking of a Class A Substance | x1 |
| Possession of Narcotics | x7 |
| Forgery | x4 |
| Maintaining a Place for Distribution | x1 |
III. Representative
Nia Liviaus
IV. Officers Involved
N/A [none were listed in the incident report]
V. Evidence
Arrest Warrant: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SESK29eI1rg7m1_RtVT32ytGqpD7lcRXZMFSp50SKSo/edit
incident report:
VI. Actions Taken
| TOTAL TIME | 585 Months | TOTAL FINE | $20300 |
VII. Witnesses
Character Witnesses:
T-640 Owen Clarke
CO-360 Albus Davies
T-646 Mike Sleezy
CO-305 Bronson Stone
S-220 Mike West
T-601 John Shepard
T-690 Bruno Wilson
ST-401 Bo Stabler
Deedy Sanchez
The defense will be submitting a written statement from Quinton Johnson during discovery.
