Username: NiaLiviaus
Select the type of case you wish to file with the court:
CRIMINAL APPEAL
Defendant:
Jacob Beannut [justpiggy]
I. Statement of Claim
The defense contends that the arrest warrant under which Mr. Beannut was apprehended contained a critical error at the time of execution, rendering it invalid. We respectfully request the court's intervention to address this issue and make a ruling accordingly.
The defense has carefully reviewed the circumstances surrounding Mr. Beannut's arrest and has identified a substantive flaw in the arrest warrant. It has come to our attention that the warrant, as executed, contained an error that should have precluded its issuance and subsequent execution. This error, we argue, calls into question the validity of the entire arrest and, by extension, the charges brought against Mr. Beannut.
In light of the above, we kindly request the court to consider the following:
II. Charge(s)
III. Representative
Nia Liviaus [selliee]
IV. Officers Involved
Alexandr Nolan
Jeremie Rodriguez
V. Evidence
Picture of the warrant at the time it was executed, but since has been changed. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachme...1373878df96107d0dcd89fcef70fe468cba4d28058a5&
VI. Actions Taken
79 Months | $2,100 Fine
VII. Witnesses
The defense calls no witnesses at this time but holds the right to add witnesses up until the end of discovery
Select the type of case you wish to file with the court:
CRIMINAL APPEAL
Defendant:
Jacob Beannut [justpiggy]
I. Statement of Claim
The defense contends that the arrest warrant under which Mr. Beannut was apprehended contained a critical error at the time of execution, rendering it invalid. We respectfully request the court's intervention to address this issue and make a ruling accordingly.
The defense has carefully reviewed the circumstances surrounding Mr. Beannut's arrest and has identified a substantive flaw in the arrest warrant. It has come to our attention that the warrant, as executed, contained an error that should have precluded its issuance and subsequent execution. This error, we argue, calls into question the validity of the entire arrest and, by extension, the charges brought against Mr. Beannut.
In light of the above, we kindly request the court to consider the following:
- Error in the Arrest Warrant: The defense contends that the arrest warrant executed for Mr. Jacob Beannut contained a material error at the time it was executed. This error raises concerns about the warrant's validity, and we submit that the court should review the circumstances surrounding its issuance and execution.
- Request for Court Intervention: Given the alleged error in the arrest warrant, we respectfully request the court to intervene in this matter and conduct a thorough examination of the circumstances leading to Mr. Beannut's arrest. We believe that a ruling from the court is essential to ensure the fair and just administration of justice in this case.
- Potential Implications: Should the court find merit in our claim and determine that the arrest warrant was indeed flawed at the time of execution, we request the court to assess the implications on the charges brought against Mr. Beannut. It is our position that an invalid arrest warrant should nullify the subsequent charges, and we seek the court's guidance on the appropriate course of action.
II. Charge(s)
| Armed Robbery of a Bank (ACC) | x1 |
III. Representative
Nia Liviaus [selliee]
IV. Officers Involved
Alexandr Nolan
Jeremie Rodriguez
V. Evidence
Picture of the warrant at the time it was executed, but since has been changed. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachme...1373878df96107d0dcd89fcef70fe468cba4d28058a5&
VI. Actions Taken
79 Months | $2,100 Fine
VII. Witnesses
The defense calls no witnesses at this time but holds the right to add witnesses up until the end of discovery
